Formal warnings to tenants: grounds, content and sample wording
Kevin Celentano · 2026-10-14
The tenant on the second floor parties until three every weekend. The neighbours complain to you, and a conversation has changed nothing. Or the rent has been arriving on the twentieth rather than the third working day for months.
At this point, many landlords wonder whether they can terminate the tenancy straight away. Usually, the answer is: not yet. First comes a formal warning: a formal demand to stop a specific behaviour, coupled with an explanation of the consequences.
A good warning is brief, specific and delivered with proof of receipt. A poor one may mean that a later termination fails in court. Here we explain when you must issue a warning, what to include and how to prove receipt.
01When you must issue a warning and when you do not need to
Whether a warning is compulsory depends on what you intend to do afterwards. The law distinguishes between three routes.
| Your objective | Warning required? | Legal basis |
|---|---|---|
| Termination without notice for a breach of duty (noise, unauthorised subletting, insults) | Yes, or a deadline to remedy the breach | § 543 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BGB |
| Termination without notice for rent arrears of two months’ rent or more | No | § 543 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Nr. 3 BGB |
| Termination without notice for an unpaid deposit (two months’ rent excluding service charges) | No | § 569 Abs. 2a BGB |
| Termination without notice for persistently late payments | Yes; one further late payment may then be enough | § 543 Abs. 1 BGB, BGH VIII ZR 364/04 |
| Ordinary termination with notice for a breach of duty | Not required, but often decisive | § 573 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BGB, BGH VIII ZR 145/07 |
| Injunction claim against use that breaches the tenancy agreement | Yes | § 541 BGB |
For serious breaches, you can proceed without a warning if it clearly offers no prospect of success or if immediate termination is justified for particular reasons (§ 543 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Nr. 1 und 2 BGB). This means cases such as physical assaults against you or neighbours. You should rely on this only after obtaining a lawyer’s assessment.
Ordinary termination with notice is the case that is often underestimated. The Federal Court of Justice says that no warning is required for this. For a minor breach, such as a one-off oversight, however, it is often only the failure to heed a warning that gives the conduct enough weight to justify termination. If in doubt, therefore, issue a warning first.
02Typical grounds for a formal warning
You can issue a warning for any breach of duties under the tenancy agreement or house rules. In practice, the same cases crop up repeatedly.
| Breach | What to look out for |
|---|---|
| Late rent payments | Payment is due on the third working day of the month (§ 556b BGB); list the dates payments were received |
| Noise nuisance | Quiet hours under the house rules or tenancy agreement; a noise log with dates, times and witnesses |
| Unauthorised subletting | Permission is required (§ 540 BGB); however, the tenant is entitled to it if they have a legitimate interest (§ 553 BGB) |
| Keeping pets without consent | A blanket ban on dogs and cats in a standard-form agreement is invalid (BGH VIII ZR 168/12); the individual circumstances matter |
| Breaches of the house rules | For example, stairwell cleaning, rubbish or bicycles in the corridor; you can only issue warnings for obligations that have been agreed |
| Neglect of the flat | For example, failure to ventilate resulting in mould, or reported damage that the tenant fails to notify you of |
| Alterations without consent | Walls, floors, fitted installations, external aerials |
Subletting deserves a closer look. If the tenant has an understandable reason, such as a partner moving in or an extended absence for work, you generally have to grant permission. A warning for lack of permission may then be ineffective. Read more in the glossary entry on subletting.
03What to include in a formal warning
The law does not prescribe a particular form. You can therefore also issue a warning verbally. That simply will not help you later if you need to prove its content. Always put it in writing, and be as specific as possible.
- 01Sender, recipient, rented property
All landlords as senders, all tenants named in the agreement as recipients, and the address and location of the flat within the building.
- 02Subject line stating the reason
For example, “Formal warning for repeated noise nuisance” or “Formal warning for late rent payments”.
- 03A precise description of the breach
Date, time, what happened and who witnessed it. For payments, every due date and every date payment was received.
- 04The duty breached
Identify the clause in the tenancy agreement, the house rule or the statutory duty.
- 05The demand
Stop the behaviour immediately or remedy the situation by a fixed date.
- 06The consequence
A clear statement that you will terminate the tenancy, potentially without notice, if another breach of the same kind occurs.
- 07Signature and date
Signed by hand, by all landlords where there is more than one.
The core of a warning for late payment could be expressed in your own words as follows:
Under § 4 of your tenancy agreement, the rent must be paid no later than the third working day of each month. The rent for July, August and September 2026 did not reach our account until 18 July, 21 August and 19 September 2026 respectively. We hereby issue you with a formal warning and require you to pay the rent on time in future. If the rent is received late again, we will terminate the tenancy, potentially without notice.
Avoid combined warnings containing five allegations at once. If just one is disputed, the whole letter loses weight. One warning per breach is clearer.
04Proving receipt
The warning takes effect only once the tenant receives it. If they later deny receipt, you must prove it. In practice, more warnings fail on this point than on their content.
| Method | Evidential value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Personal handover with acknowledgement of receipt | High | The tenant signs a copy |
| Messenger posting it through the letterbox | High | The messenger reads the letter beforehand, records the date and time, and can give evidence as a witness |
| Registered post with recorded letterbox delivery (Einwurf-Einschreiben) | Medium | Proves delivery through the letterbox, not the contents of the envelope |
| Registered post requiring handover (Übergabe-Einschreiben) | Low | If the tenant does not collect it, it is often not deemed to have been received |
| Email or messaging app | Low | Receipt and content can easily be disputed |
The safest option is a messenger who knows the contents. This could be someone you know who is not themselves a landlord of the flat. Keep a copy of the warning and the messenger’s note together.
05Worked example: what terminating without a warning could cost
Michael lets a flat for €750 a month excluding service charges. The tenant has been breaching the quiet hours for months. Michael terminates without notice and without first issuing a warning, then brings an eviction claim. The court dismisses the claim because no warning was issued. The name and figures are fictional; the calculation is an example, not a forecast.
| Basis | Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| Value in dispute: annual net rent excluding service charges, 12 × €750 | § 41 Abs. 2 GKG | €9,000 |
| Court fees (3.0 fee units) | GKG from 1 June 2025 | €781.50 |
| Own lawyer, including hearing attendance | RVG from 1 June 2025, including 19% VAT | €1,786.49 |
| Tenant’s lawyer, whose costs Michael must reimburse | § 91 ZPO | €1,786.49 |
| Costs borne by Michael | −€4,354.48 |
Around €4,350 is almost six months’ rent excluding service charges. On top of that come months in which the problem remains and the neighbours continue to complain. A warning delivered by a messenger would have cost Michael a few euros and an hour.
For how to handle termination and eviction correctly afterwards, read the guides to notice periods in tenancy agreements and eviction claims. The eviction claim cost calculator calculates the costs for your own case.
06What the tenant can do about a formal warning
Many tenants want to challenge a warning they consider unfair. They cannot bring a claim against it. The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that a tenant can neither demand the withdrawal of a warning nor require the landlord to refrain from issuing one, and cannot obtain a court declaration that it was unjustified (BGH, Urteil vom 20.02.2008, VIII ZR 139/07).
That does not mean every warning carries weight. The court examines whether it was justified only if you later terminate the tenancy and rely on it. If the allegation cannot then be substantiated, the warning will not support the termination. Your documentation therefore becomes decisive only when it really matters.
If the tenant replies in writing to dispute the warning, add the letter to your file. A conversation may still be useful. Many conflicts are resolved when both sides understand that the matter is serious.
07Risks and limits
A warning is not a licence to do as you please. Issuing warnings over trivial matters or without evidence damages your relationship with the tenant and weakens later, genuine warnings. Issue warnings only for matters you can prove and that are actually governed by the agreement or the law.
If a breach recurs, it must be of the same kind as the breach covered by the warning for that warning to support termination. A warning about noise will not help with a later termination for late payments.
Where a breach affects other people’s health or safety, where there is a dispute over subletting, or where you intend to terminate afterwards, involve a lawyer specialising in tenancy law. The cost is usually lower than losing a court case. For investors with several flats, a property manager can handle reminders and deadlines for the flat, but the decision to issue a formal warning or terminate remains with the owner.
- the breach is supported by specific evidence (bank statement, noise log, photos)
- you are not ruling out terminating the tenancy later
- a conversation has changed nothing
- it is a one-off, minor issue
- the tenant may be entitled to permission, for example for subletting
- all you have is rumours from neighbours
08Further reading
- Notice periods in tenancy agreements
- Eviction claims: process, duration and costs
- Serial rent defaulters: recognising the signs, prevention and taking the right action
- Invalid clauses in tenancy agreements
- Your rights and duties as a landlord
- Tenancy agreement template
09Sources
- §§ 540, 541, 543, 553, 556b, 569, 573 BGB, gesetze-im-internet.de, accessed on 14 October 2026
- BGH, Urteil vom 20.02.2008, VIII ZR 139/07 (no claim against a formal warning)
- BGH, Urteil vom 28.11.2007, VIII ZR 145/07 (ordinary termination with notice without a prior warning)
- BGH, Urteil vom 11.01.2006, VIII ZR 364/04 (late payment after a warning)
- BGH, Urteil vom 20.03.2013, VIII ZR 168/12 (pet-keeping clause)
- BGH, Urteil vom 25.08.2020, VIII ZR 59/20 (formal warning and ordinary termination with notice in the alternative)
- § 41 GKG, § 91 ZPO; fees under GKG and RVG in the versions applicable from 1 June 2025
- Keyword data: Semrush, Germany database, as at 14 October 2026
Note: This guide provides general information and is not a substitute for legal advice on an individual case. Before terminating a tenancy, you should have the warning and the circumstances reviewed by a lawyer specialising in tenancy law.
FAQHäufige Fragen
Does a formal warning to a tenant have to be in writing?
No, the law does not prescribe a particular form. However, because you must later be able to prove its content and receipt, you should always issue warnings in writing and document receipt through a messenger or an acknowledgement of receipt.
How many warnings are needed before terminating a tenancy?
There is no fixed number. One warning is often enough if the tenant subsequently repeats the same breach. For late payments, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled that just one further late payment after a warning may justify termination without notice (VIII ZR 364/04).
Do I need to issue a warning if the tenant does not pay?
Not if the arrears reach the thresholds under § 543 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 BGB: two months’ rent in total, or more than one month’s rent across two consecutive payment dates. By contrast, you do need a warning where payments are regularly late but made in full.
Can the tenant challenge a formal warning in court?
No. The BGH has ruled that tenants cannot demand that a warning be withdrawn or that the landlord refrain from issuing one, nor can they obtain a declaration that it is incorrect (VIII ZR 139/07). The warning is reviewed only in subsequent proceedings concerning termination.
How long does a formal warning remain valid?
There is no fixed expiry date. The longer the tenant behaves correctly after the warning, the less weight it carries if a new breach occurs. If years have passed, issuing a new warning is usually sensible.
Can the property manager issue a formal warning to the tenant?
Yes, if authorised to do so by the owner. In that case, enclose the original power of attorney with the warning so that the tenant cannot reject it for lack of proof of authority.
Can I issue a warning for noise nuisance if only the neighbours have complained?
Yes, but you need evidence. Ask the neighbours to provide a noise log recording the date, time and nature of the disturbance, and ask whether they are willing to act as witnesses.