InvestImmo.de

Formal warnings to tenants: grounds, content and sample wording

Kevin Celentano · 2026-10-14

Formal warnings at a glance
0
Formal requirements
but without proof of receipt, a warning is worthless
1
Formal warning
may be enough; there is no fixed number
0
Right to bring a claim
for the tenant against an unjustified warning
−4,354 €
In the example
what losing an eviction claim could cost

The tenant on the second floor parties until three every weekend. The neighbours complain to you, and a conversation has changed nothing. Or the rent has been arriving on the twentieth rather than the third working day for months.

At this point, many landlords wonder whether they can terminate the tenancy straight away. Usually, the answer is: not yet. First comes a formal warning: a formal demand to stop a specific behaviour, coupled with an explanation of the consequences.

A good warning is brief, specific and delivered with proof of receipt. A poor one may mean that a later termination fails in court. Here we explain when you must issue a warning, what to include and how to prove receipt.

01When you must issue a warning and when you do not need to

Whether a warning is compulsory depends on what you intend to do afterwards. The law distinguishes between three routes.

Your objectiveWarning required?Legal basis
Termination without notice for a breach of duty (noise, unauthorised subletting, insults)Yes, or a deadline to remedy the breach§ 543 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BGB
Termination without notice for rent arrears of two months’ rent or moreNo§ 543 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Nr. 3 BGB
Termination without notice for an unpaid deposit (two months’ rent excluding service charges)No§ 569 Abs. 2a BGB
Termination without notice for persistently late paymentsYes; one further late payment may then be enough§ 543 Abs. 1 BGB, BGH VIII ZR 364/04
Ordinary termination with notice for a breach of dutyNot required, but often decisive§ 573 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 BGB, BGH VIII ZR 145/07
Injunction claim against use that breaches the tenancy agreementYes§ 541 BGB

For serious breaches, you can proceed without a warning if it clearly offers no prospect of success or if immediate termination is justified for particular reasons (§ 543 Abs. 3 Satz 2 Nr. 1 und 2 BGB). This means cases such as physical assaults against you or neighbours. You should rely on this only after obtaining a lawyer’s assessment.

Ordinary termination with notice is the case that is often underestimated. The Federal Court of Justice says that no warning is required for this. For a minor breach, such as a one-off oversight, however, it is often only the failure to heed a warning that gives the conduct enough weight to justify termination. If in doubt, therefore, issue a warning first.

02Typical grounds for a formal warning

You can issue a warning for any breach of duties under the tenancy agreement or house rules. In practice, the same cases crop up repeatedly.

BreachWhat to look out for
Late rent paymentsPayment is due on the third working day of the month (§ 556b BGB); list the dates payments were received
Noise nuisanceQuiet hours under the house rules or tenancy agreement; a noise log with dates, times and witnesses
Unauthorised sublettingPermission is required (§ 540 BGB); however, the tenant is entitled to it if they have a legitimate interest (§ 553 BGB)
Keeping pets without consentA blanket ban on dogs and cats in a standard-form agreement is invalid (BGH VIII ZR 168/12); the individual circumstances matter
Breaches of the house rulesFor example, stairwell cleaning, rubbish or bicycles in the corridor; you can only issue warnings for obligations that have been agreed
Neglect of the flatFor example, failure to ventilate resulting in mould, or reported damage that the tenant fails to notify you of
Alterations without consentWalls, floors, fitted installations, external aerials

Subletting deserves a closer look. If the tenant has an understandable reason, such as a partner moving in or an extended absence for work, you generally have to grant permission. A warning for lack of permission may then be ineffective. Read more in the glossary entry on subletting.

03What to include in a formal warning

The law does not prescribe a particular form. You can therefore also issue a warning verbally. That simply will not help you later if you need to prove its content. Always put it in writing, and be as specific as possible.

Structure of an effective formal warning
  1. 01
    Sender, recipient, rented property

    All landlords as senders, all tenants named in the agreement as recipients, and the address and location of the flat within the building.

  2. 02
    Subject line stating the reason

    For example, “Formal warning for repeated noise nuisance” or “Formal warning for late rent payments”.

  3. 03
    A precise description of the breach

    Date, time, what happened and who witnessed it. For payments, every due date and every date payment was received.

  4. 04
    The duty breached

    Identify the clause in the tenancy agreement, the house rule or the statutory duty.

  5. 05
    The demand

    Stop the behaviour immediately or remedy the situation by a fixed date.

  6. 06
    The consequence

    A clear statement that you will terminate the tenancy, potentially without notice, if another breach of the same kind occurs.

  7. 07
    Signature and date

    Signed by hand, by all landlords where there is more than one.

The core of a warning for late payment could be expressed in your own words as follows:

Under § 4 of your tenancy agreement, the rent must be paid no later than the third working day of each month. The rent for July, August and September 2026 did not reach our account until 18 July, 21 August and 19 September 2026 respectively. We hereby issue you with a formal warning and require you to pay the rent on time in future. If the rent is received late again, we will terminate the tenancy, potentially without notice.

Avoid combined warnings containing five allegations at once. If just one is disputed, the whole letter loses weight. One warning per breach is clearer.

04Proving receipt

The warning takes effect only once the tenant receives it. If they later deny receipt, you must prove it. In practice, more warnings fail on this point than on their content.

MethodEvidential valueNote
Personal handover with acknowledgement of receiptHighThe tenant signs a copy
Messenger posting it through the letterboxHighThe messenger reads the letter beforehand, records the date and time, and can give evidence as a witness
Registered post with recorded letterbox delivery (Einwurf-Einschreiben)MediumProves delivery through the letterbox, not the contents of the envelope
Registered post requiring handover (Übergabe-Einschreiben)LowIf the tenant does not collect it, it is often not deemed to have been received
Email or messaging appLowReceipt and content can easily be disputed

The safest option is a messenger who knows the contents. This could be someone you know who is not themselves a landlord of the flat. Keep a copy of the warning and the messenger’s note together.

05Worked example: what terminating without a warning could cost

Michael lets a flat for €750 a month excluding service charges. The tenant has been breaching the quiet hours for months. Michael terminates without notice and without first issuing a warning, then brings an eviction claim. The court dismisses the claim because no warning was issued. The name and figures are fictional; the calculation is an example, not a forecast.

Costs of the unsuccessful eviction claim
BasisAmount
Value in dispute: annual net rent excluding service charges, 12 × €750§ 41 Abs. 2 GKG€9,000
Court fees (3.0 fee units)GKG from 1 June 2025€781.50
Own lawyer, including hearing attendanceRVG from 1 June 2025, including 19% VAT€1,786.49
Tenant’s lawyer, whose costs Michael must reimburse§ 91 ZPO€1,786.49
Costs borne by Michael−€4,354.48
Our own example calculation, as at 14 October 2026, using the fee figures in the eviction claim guide. Eviction only, without a payment claim or an appeal. Excludes the time lost: the disturbance continues during the proceedings.

Around €4,350 is almost six months’ rent excluding service charges. On top of that come months in which the problem remains and the neighbours continue to complain. A warning delivered by a messenger would have cost Michael a few euros and an hour.

What the missing warning costs in this example
Court
−€781.50
Own lawyer
−€1,786.49
Tenant’s lawyer
−€1,786.49
Assumptions as in the calculation above.

For how to handle termination and eviction correctly afterwards, read the guides to notice periods in tenancy agreements and eviction claims. The eviction claim cost calculator calculates the costs for your own case.

06What the tenant can do about a formal warning

Many tenants want to challenge a warning they consider unfair. They cannot bring a claim against it. The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that a tenant can neither demand the withdrawal of a warning nor require the landlord to refrain from issuing one, and cannot obtain a court declaration that it was unjustified (BGH, Urteil vom 20.02.2008, VIII ZR 139/07).

That does not mean every warning carries weight. The court examines whether it was justified only if you later terminate the tenancy and rely on it. If the allegation cannot then be substantiated, the warning will not support the termination. Your documentation therefore becomes decisive only when it really matters.

If the tenant replies in writing to dispute the warning, add the letter to your file. A conversation may still be useful. Many conflicts are resolved when both sides understand that the matter is serious.

07Risks and limits

A warning is not a licence to do as you please. Issuing warnings over trivial matters or without evidence damages your relationship with the tenant and weakens later, genuine warnings. Issue warnings only for matters you can prove and that are actually governed by the agreement or the law.

If a breach recurs, it must be of the same kind as the breach covered by the warning for that warning to support termination. A warning about noise will not help with a later termination for late payments.

Where a breach affects other people’s health or safety, where there is a dispute over subletting, or where you intend to terminate afterwards, involve a lawyer specialising in tenancy law. The cost is usually lower than losing a court case. For investors with several flats, a property manager can handle reminders and deadlines for the flat, but the decision to issue a formal warning or terminate remains with the owner.

Issuing a warning makes sense if …
  • the breach is supported by specific evidence (bank statement, noise log, photos)
  • you are not ruling out terminating the tenancy later
  • a conversation has changed nothing
Check first if …
  • it is a one-off, minor issue
  • the tenant may be entitled to permission, for example for subletting
  • all you have is rumours from neighbours

08Further reading

09Sources

  • §§ 540, 541, 543, 553, 556b, 569, 573 BGB, gesetze-im-internet.de, accessed on 14 October 2026
  • BGH, Urteil vom 20.02.2008, VIII ZR 139/07 (no claim against a formal warning)
  • BGH, Urteil vom 28.11.2007, VIII ZR 145/07 (ordinary termination with notice without a prior warning)
  • BGH, Urteil vom 11.01.2006, VIII ZR 364/04 (late payment after a warning)
  • BGH, Urteil vom 20.03.2013, VIII ZR 168/12 (pet-keeping clause)
  • BGH, Urteil vom 25.08.2020, VIII ZR 59/20 (formal warning and ordinary termination with notice in the alternative)
  • § 41 GKG, § 91 ZPO; fees under GKG and RVG in the versions applicable from 1 June 2025
  • Keyword data: Semrush, Germany database, as at 14 October 2026

Note: This guide provides general information and is not a substitute for legal advice on an individual case. Before terminating a tenancy, you should have the warning and the circumstances reviewed by a lawyer specialising in tenancy law.

FAQHäufige Fragen

Does a formal warning to a tenant have to be in writing?

No, the law does not prescribe a particular form. However, because you must later be able to prove its content and receipt, you should always issue warnings in writing and document receipt through a messenger or an acknowledgement of receipt.

How many warnings are needed before terminating a tenancy?

There is no fixed number. One warning is often enough if the tenant subsequently repeats the same breach. For late payments, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled that just one further late payment after a warning may justify termination without notice (VIII ZR 364/04).

Do I need to issue a warning if the tenant does not pay?

Not if the arrears reach the thresholds under § 543 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 BGB: two months’ rent in total, or more than one month’s rent across two consecutive payment dates. By contrast, you do need a warning where payments are regularly late but made in full.

Can the tenant challenge a formal warning in court?

No. The BGH has ruled that tenants cannot demand that a warning be withdrawn or that the landlord refrain from issuing one, nor can they obtain a declaration that it is incorrect (VIII ZR 139/07). The warning is reviewed only in subsequent proceedings concerning termination.

How long does a formal warning remain valid?

There is no fixed expiry date. The longer the tenant behaves correctly after the warning, the less weight it carries if a new breach occurs. If years have passed, issuing a new warning is usually sensible.

Can the property manager issue a formal warning to the tenant?

Yes, if authorised to do so by the owner. In that case, enclose the original power of attorney with the warning so that the tenant cannot reject it for lack of proof of authority.

Can I issue a warning for noise nuisance if only the neighbours have complained?

Yes, but you need evidence. Ask the neighbours to provide a noise log recording the date, time and nature of the disturbance, and ask whether they are willing to act as witnesses.